It seems I can't use '-' blocks beneath ':' blocks, for instance:
:javascript
var x = 0;
- #{ "var y = " ~ d_variable ~ ";" }
var arr = [
- foreach(x; things)
#{ x ~ "," }
];
You get the idea... these don't seem to be getting executed, they're just pasted verbatim into the javascript.
Is there a better approach?
Am 21.11.2013 15:53, schrieb Manu Evans:
It seems I can't use '-' blocks beneath ':' blocks, for instance:
:javascript var x = 0; - #{ "var y = " ~ d_variable ~ ";" } var arr = [ - foreach(x; things) #{ x ~ "," } ];You get the idea... these don't seem to be getting executed, they're just pasted verbatim into the javascript.
Is there a better approach?
Currently the only way that will work is to use a normal script node and
'|' for the text:
script(type="text/javascript")
|var x = 0
|var y = #{d_variable};
|var arr = [
- foreach(x; things)
| #{x},
|];
The issue with :filters is that runtime and compile time processing get
mixed up when D code gets inserted due to the way they are currently
implemented. That should be improved, but the priority for that so far
is quite low compared to other features/bugs.
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:11:16 +0100, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 21.11.2013 15:53, schrieb Manu Evans:
It seems I can't use '-' blocks beneath ':' blocks, for instance:
:javascript var x = 0; - #{ "var y = " ~ d_variable ~ ";" } var arr = [ - foreach(x; things) #{ x ~ "," } ];You get the idea... these don't seem to be getting executed, they're just pasted verbatim into the javascript.
Is there a better approach?Currently the only way that will work is to use a normal script node and
'|' for the text:script(type="text/javascript") |var x = 0 |var y = #{d_variable}; |var arr = [ - foreach(x; things) | #{x}, |];
Ah, of course. So obvious! The issue with :filters is that runtime and compile time processing get Np.
mixed up when D code gets inserted due to the way they are currently
implemented. That should be improved, but the priority for that so far
is quite low compared to other features/bugs.
script(type="text/javascript")
|var x = 0
- foreach(x; things)
| #{x}, // <-- it can't find x
|];
Problem:
Error: undefined identifier x, did you mean template to(T)?
It seems that the scope of the '|' block under the foreach isn't scoped correctly, x is not local...?
You know, I reckon there's a possible library function here. What I need to do is make some D data available to the javascript.
It would be awesome to have a function which would produce a javascript declaration from a D value/structure.
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:26:16 GMT, Manu Evans wrote:
script(type="text/javascript") |var x = 0 - foreach(x; things) | #{x}, // <-- it can't find x |];Problem:
Error: undefined identifier x, did you mean template to(T)?It seems that the scope of the '|' block under the foreach isn't scoped correctly, x is not local...?
You know, I reckon there's a possible library function here. What I need to do is make some D data available to the javascript.
It would be awesome to have a function which would produce a javascript declaration from a D value/structure.
Actually, as far as I can tell, all the '|' beneath script are ignored.
So just the same as :javascript, everything beneath script() seems to be copied verbatim as well.
Am 21.11.2013 16:51, schrieb Manu Evans:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:26:16 GMT, Manu Evans wrote:
script(type="text/javascript") |var x = 0 - foreach(x; things) | #{x}, // <-- it can't find x |];Problem:
Error: undefined identifier x, did you mean template to(T)?It seems that the scope of the '|' block under the foreach isn't scoped correctly, x is not local...?
You know, I reckon there's a possible library function here. What I need to do is make some D data available to the javascript.
It would be awesome to have a function which would produce a javascript declaration from a D value/structure.Actually, as far as I can tell, all the '|' beneath script are ignored.
So just the same as :javascript, everything beneath script() seems to be copied verbatim as well.
Damn, you are right, script and style tags get special treatment. So the
correct way is this and control statements are not really possible:
script
var x = [#{join(things, ",")}];
The idea of automatically mirroring D data as JavaScript is nice. A good
approximation should be to use JSON:
script
var x = !{serializeToJson(things)}
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:19:18 +0100, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 21.11.2013 16:51, schrieb Manu Evans:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:26:16 GMT, Manu Evans wrote:
script(type="text/javascript") |var x = 0 - foreach(x; things) | #{x}, // <-- it can't find x |];Problem:
Error: undefined identifier x, did you mean template to(T)?It seems that the scope of the '|' block under the foreach isn't scoped correctly, x is not local...?
You know, I reckon there's a possible library function here. What I need to do is make some D data available to the javascript.
It would be awesome to have a function which would produce a javascript declaration from a D value/structure.Actually, as far as I can tell, all the '|' beneath script are ignored.
So just the same as :javascript, everything beneath script() seems to be copied verbatim as well.Damn, you are right, script and style tags get special treatment. So the
correct way is this and control statements are not really possible:script var x = [#{join(things, ",")}];The idea of automatically mirroring D data as JavaScript is nice. A good
approximation should be to use JSON:script var x = !{serializeToJson(things)}
Yup, that's what I ended up with, does my job, but it could be better.
Some things not satisfied by that approach: