On 7/21/16 8:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
So there are some performance issues here. If I use option 1, it's very
slow. For my dataset which has about 20,000 rows, it takes 4 seconds to
transmit the result.For option 2, it takes 2 seconds. This doesn't make a lot of sense, I
would have expected option 1 to be faster.
I didn't record this properly. Option 2 is slower, 2.7 seconds. Option 1
is faster at 2.1 seconds.
But there is definitely no way this should be so slow. I'd expect
something near the 400ms. Investigating some more.
-Steve