Continuous Integration for Vibe.d?

Permalink: HTTP NNTP

Posted Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:29:46 GMT

Reply

Does vibe.d have a CI server set up to make sure builds don't break, and stay working across different compilers? I've got a feeling that'd be very useful for vibe.d to mature further. I know that I've run into incompatibility issues between DMD, DMD-Head, and LDC, and a CI server might mitigate some pain for many others to. I'm not sure how difficult it'd be to set up, however.

A lot of open source projects, both big (Ruby on Rails) and small (lots of Rust libraries now) make use of free CI hosting at http://travis-ci.org. Perhaps that would be a good place to start?

--Dylan

Re: Continuous Integration for Vibe.d?

Permalink: HTTP NNTP

Sönke Ludwig

Posted Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:06:26 +0200 in reply to Dylan Knutson

Reply

Am 19.10.2013 02:29, schrieb Dylan Knutson:

Does vibe.d have a CI server set up to make sure builds don't break, and stay working across different compilers? I've got a feeling that'd be very useful for vibe.d to mature further. I know that I've run into incompatibility issues between DMD, DMD-Head, and LDC, and a CI server might mitigate some pain for many others to. I'm not sure how difficult it'd be to set up, however.

A lot of open source projects, both big (Ruby on Rails) and small (lots of Rust libraries now) make use of free CI hosting at http://travis-ci.org. Perhaps that would be a good place to start?

--Dylan

We are currently building up the infrastructure. I have a simple CI
running, but it still needs to be targeted for more platforms (most
importantly for more compilers/versions).

So if nothing gets in between, by the end of the month the basics should
stay pretty stable.

Re: Continuous Integration for Vibe.d?

Permalink: HTTP NNTP

Dylan Knutson

Posted Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:59:25 GMT in reply to Sönke Ludwig

Reply

Sounds fantastic, I look forward to it!