I added an entry for Vibe.d to the following Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparisonofapplication_servers
If anyone can give a better 1-line summary of Vibe.d I would be happy if you were to update my entry.
Craig
I added an entry for Vibe.d to the following Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparisonofapplication_servers
If anyone can give a better 1-line summary of Vibe.d I would be happy if you were to update my entry.
Craig
Am 27.08.2013 18:16, schrieb Craig Dillabaugh:
I added an entry for Vibe.d to the following Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparisonofapplication_servers
If anyone can give a better 1-line summary of Vibe.d I would be happy if you were to update my entry.
Craig
Someone seems to have removed the entry again... not sure what rule he
thinks was violated.
Am 27.08.2013 18:30, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Am 27.08.2013 18:16, schrieb Craig Dillabaugh:
I added an entry for Vibe.d to the following Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparisonofapplication_servers
If anyone can give a better 1-line summary of Vibe.d I would be happy
if you were to update my entry.Craig
Someone seems to have removed the entry again... not sure what rule he
thinks was violated.
Okay, it was probably because there was a link to vibed.org, but only
links to other wikipedia articles are usually allowed. So it looks like
maybe a vibe.d article is needed first (assuming this is going to be
accepted).
Ugh, but is vibe.d actually an application server? It does not act as a container for some external application but embeds both HTTP server and application into single process - I don't think this counts.
Am 27.08.2013 18:45, schrieb Dicebot:
Ugh, but is vibe.d actually an application server? It does not act as a container for some external application but embeds both HTTP server and application into single process - I don't think this counts.
Looking through the list, there seem to be some "application server
toolkits" (i.e. libraries) and the term in general seems to be a bit
fuzzy, so maybe it fits indeed - not sure.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:27:10 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.08.2013 18:45, schrieb Dicebot:
Ugh, but is vibe.d actually an application server? It does not act as a container for some external application but embeds both HTTP server and application into single process - I don't think this counts.
Looking through the list, there seem to be some "application server
toolkits" (i.e. libraries) and the term in general seems to be a bit
fuzzy, so maybe it fits indeed - not sure.
I wasn't entirely sure, but as Sönke pointed out, whatever definition they use for the page seems to be pretty broad.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:45:27 GMT, Dicebot wrote:
Ugh, but is vibe.d actually an application server? It does not act as a container for some external application but embeds both HTTP server and application into single process - I don't think this counts.
What would you call vibe.d then, and what would be its competing products?
vibe.d is an application framework, not an application server.