On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:30:11 GMT, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:

Fair enough. I think I would be inclined to request/recommend that built files get placed in a dedicated build/ directory, though, so that it's easy to separate source from built files.

Kind of reasonable but this is an area were distinction betwen dub-as-package-manager and dub-as-build-tool is worth thinking about - as far as I understand, dub is expected to support different build systems by design and thus standard file placement should be done for all supported ones (don't know if it is an issue with current implementation)