I think you are being a tad bit pessimistic.
You have a 'production' server(that looks kickass. Seriously.) running
already, do you not?
Right now my major complaints are simply polish. (if they even qualify as
And it's still ahead of a lot of other projects that I have seen.
Development is still proceeding at a relatively rapid pace.
I would start 'pushing it out there.'
Make it clear that you want feedback on any issues, Make it clear it's
'beta', I really
do not think that there is currently much at all holding it back. It's in
a good enough state to
be usable. Go! I want to see this thing on the D announce list again!
Ha! I knew I saw Vibe.d on Wikipedia!
I wonder where exactly the "D" link points to... ;-D
Oh, and I honestly find a lot more awesome D stuff by stalking the crap
out of anyone who has A D project
in their repos on github. I kinda got burned by the old site when I first
started with D.
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:00:43 -0500, Sönke Ludwig
Am 06.09.2012 20:17, schrieb Michael_S:
I stumbled across Vibe.D a few months ago while looking at the D
programming language. But when I do a regular web search, it's not
commonly listed. Would it make sense to get references to it posted at
dlang.org or the D projects pages at prowiki.org/wiki4d, and maybe on
wikipedia and the wikipedia list of web frameworks?
I wanted to make a bigger announcement and put some effort into
improving visiblity as soon as v0.8.0 will be out, which is supposed to
be stable, performance optimized, and feature-complete (regarding the
advertised features). But I guess at least for D-specific sites it would
definitely make sense to have references there, even if the current
state is not yet "stable".
In the case of wikipedia I suspect it doesn't yet qualify for its own
article (but maybe only the german version is that strict). The web
framework list sounds like it could work, although it has to be said
that vibe.d is not a pure web framework, even though it contains a web
server and an HTML template system...