On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:32:11 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Sorry, I didn't have time to look into this, yet. But this is
interesting - if anything, I would expectany
to trigger more often
thanread
, but not the other way around. I'll review that part of the
code when I get some time.
Hi, there must be some misunderstanding. any
was indeed triggering more often. In fact when it was set to any
, it was in some state of perma-trigger. And that was probably the reason, why the processEvents()
call failed.