On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:32:11 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote:

Sorry, I didn't have time to look into this, yet. But this is
interesting - if anything, I would expect any to trigger more often
than read, but not the other way around. I'll review that part of the
code when I get some time.

Hi, there must be some misunderstanding. any was indeed triggering more often. In fact when it was set to any, it was in some state of perma-trigger. And that was probably the reason, why the processEvents() call failed.