On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:52:59 GMT, Suliman wrote:
that we could also make public to better support this kind of use case
I think that it would be more logical. Because it will separate handling and processing requests parts.
The current API was chosen because it is more convenient (less to type), but I also think that there is no reason not to make the direct API accessible as well.
I've added a ticket: #1130