I understand your point and believe you know what you are talking about, just to mention that for average projects this LUA-TURBO offer a good tradeoff between complexity/speed of development/performance.
I put it here to show that other people is pushing the bar high with less complexity and same/better performance.
Lua/Luajit has it's problems as well but they offer other goods worth taking in account.
Thanks for your feedback !
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:37:33 GMT, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On 2014-11-30 9:06 PM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:> Here is how a simple "Hello World !" compares between LUA-Turbo/D-Vibe.d:
LUA ==memory 10.2MB = complexit 3/10 == Requests per second: 54042.70 [#/sec] (mean)
D ==memory 17.6MB = complexit 7/10 == Requests per second: 30355.65 [#/sec] (mean)Yes, however, if you have 5 million lines of code (for the sake of exaggerating) in your application/framework, a D application still serves this hello world just as fast. Don't expect a Lua application to run it. That's an advantage over any interpreted language.