On 2013-09-15 14:05, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
It sounds like it would fit in well together with "optional" and
"runtime" dependencies. Actually, maybe "optional" could already be used
for this? Sorry if that doesn't make sense ;)
Yes, sounds like "optional" could be used for this. When/how does those
get installed?
I couldn't find any documentation for "runtime" here:
http://code.dlang.org/package-format
"runtime" sounds like dependencies needed to run the package. This only
sounds useful for binary packages. I.e. three dependencies are required
to build the package but only one dependency to run it.
/Jacob Carlborg